Optional paranoia

*
[THOUGHT EXPERIMENTS]

Sometimes I like to let my mind meditate on topics such as this.

I don't watch graphic horror movies, or other exploitatively violent commercial productions, or viral web videos. Instead, I indulge in meditations on topics like these to satisfy my (subconscious) impulse to terrify myself. It seems that most (web-conneceted) humans have a similar impulse, considering how familiar the internet and old-media operations seem to be with videos of overseas beheadings and various kinds of domestic executions.

Obviously, the link (no better or worse than 50/50) is probably published mainly to give its author the same kind of paranoiac gratification I referred to above. And, I'd ask if this fellow really "knows more" than the multitude of other Virginia-based psychos who are cashing in on their (rapidly aging) mastery of "how things work."

But let your mind experiment. What if the "hypothesis" explored by the article really did give a direct glimpse into federal governance? Suspend disbelief and consider what else would be implied by that reality? How would it change your worldview?

You know who else decapitates people?

*
[SYNTHESIS]

These guys.

It's hard to keep track of whose enemy of my enemy is a friend versus the converse. Might be sorcerer = enemy; military equipment client = friend. [Insurgent = Schrodinger's cat.]